Martha’s Murder: 22 July 1648

Poem excerpt by FP Morris

Erin Taylor, July 2014

Timeline to Martha’s murder: In 1639 Alice marries George Clarke. They have a daughter, Abigail, ca. 1641. In 1644, Martha is born, George Clarke dies, and Alice remarries Richard Bishop in December of that year.  In 1645, Damaris Bishop is born. On Wednesday, July 22, 1648, Alice murders her four year-old daughter, Martha Clarke.

At the end of this post are the original Plymouth Colony court records pertaining to the Clarke murder inquest and Alice Martin Bishop (AMB) trial. But, first, it might be helpful to understand the likely layout of the Bishop home. Their land lot was in the vicinity of 50×40 feet based on the number of persons living in the home and typical allotments for this period. The main floor was simply a large room with a hearth on one side. Cooking and dining took place here as well as this being the space in which Alice and Richard would have slept.

A steeply pitched, thatch roof permitted for one loft bedroom and this is where Abigail, Martha, and Damaris shared a bed (As a toddler, it is possible Damaris would have been co-sleeping with her parents, especially if she was still nursing). A small nook off of the main floor may have been an addition in the Bishop home for food and tool storage. Small windows provided some light but most came from the fireplace where cooking took place. On a July morning, it’s questionable that a large fire, giving off significant light, would have been burning. There would be no direct light in the loft.

Below is a reconstruction of the day’s events.

  • According to Rachel Ramsden’s testimony, she was sent to the Bishop home on an errand. This connotes the women were friendly enough with one another to have such an interaction. No time of day is given; however, we believe this would have been before noon given the fact that Martha was still in bed and Alice requested buttermilk.
  • AMB asks Rachel to go to the Winslow home for some buttermilk. This also establishes that AMB had decent relationships with neighbors. Before leaving the Bishop home, Rachel takes note that Martha is in the loft and appears to be sleeping. She also testified that she noticed nothing abnormal in AMB’s demeanor.
  • Upon Rachel’s return from the Winslow’s, she found Alice “sad and dumpish” and finds blood at the foot of the loft ladder. She asks AMB about it and AMB points to the upper chamber and “bid [Rachel to] look.”
  • This part of the testimony raises some questions: Rachel, out of fear, did not go up the ladder. Nor did she see Martha’s body. Rachel “perceived [AMB] had killed her child.” However, in the same testimony transcipt, Rachel is recorded explaining, “Moreover, she said the reason that moved her to think [AMB] had killed her child was that when [Rachel] saw the blood she looked on the bed, and the child was not there.” Either Rachel was tall enough to see into this sleeping space without ascending the ladder and Martha was missing by her estimation or Rachel didn’t see anything but the bloodied bottom of the ladder and drew her own conclusions.
  • Rachel runs to her parents’ house to tell them what she witnessed. This apparently instigated the arrival of the Plymouth coroners. They enter the Bishop home and see “much blood” at the foot of ladder. The coroners ascend the ladder and find a four-year-old female in her shift (underclothes and/or sleeping gown). Martha was either lying on her left side or her head was turned to the left. According to their report, there are two forms of injuries to Martha: (1) numerous cuts across her throat and (2), a piercing wound into her windpipe. A bloody knife is found beside Martha.
  • Alice confesses to all five coroners on that day that she killed Martha with this knife.
  • At the August 1, 1648 Court of Assistants, AMB is again interrogated, this time in the presence of Governor Bradford. She again confesses to murdering Martha and “was sorry for it.”
  • AMB’s criminal trial began October 4, 1648 with Bradford in attendance along with all General Assistant and a jury of twelve colony men. She was convicted of felonious murder (comparable to a modern murder with intent charge) and ordered to be hanged.

Throughout the inquest and trial as well as in Rachel’s testimony, there are no recorded statements as to the whereabouts of Richard, Abigail, or Damaris. There is also no mention if other adults resided in the home. We have no records as to whether AMB ever explained why she killed Martha.

As horrific as the events seem now, there is no evidence that July 22, 1648 did not begin like any other summer day in the colony. The Bishop household was up early — at least Alice, Richard, and Abigail, who had chores. Perhaps Alice let Damaris and Martha sleep in. Maybe older Abigail was sent to fetch water and Richard had left for his day’s work. Alice would prepare a morning meal like cornmeal porridge.

We feel it’s reasonable to conclude the murder happened in the mid to late morning hours. Again, we considered the buttermilk being something a mother would need earlier in the day while preparing meals. Furthermore, the presumed absence of Abigail and Richard connotes being outside of the home to attend to tasks before the worst of the day’s heat set in. Finally, Martha was still in bed in her shift (although she may have been lying down for a summer day nap).

We are left with a lot of questions and no recorded actual eyewitnesses — save for AMB. Rachel and the coroners only witnessed the aftermath of Martha’s murder.

The questions are endless:

  1. Where were Abigail and Damaris and why were they not attacked by their mother? Remember there is nothing “unique” about Martha from what we know: She shared a common father with her elder sister, Abigail. Martha was not the only female child nor was she the youngest or oldest.
  2. There are no discovered records of Alice or Richard involved in previous criminal behavior including domestic violence/child endangerment.
  3. Turns out, Rachel Ramsden is an interesting character without a pristine Plymouth reputation. She was a Mayflower daughter of Francis Eaton and Christian Penn, and married Joseph Ramsden (aka Ramsdell). She was approximately 23 years old at the time of Martha’s murder. A post on her life will be added to this blog.
  4. New England women were often in their neighbors’ homes to borrow items and visit (Berkin, 33). Surely, Alice knew someone could walk in while she was murdering Martha or that she’d have a great deal of explaining to do once Rachel returned. Why did Alice make no effort to place blame elsewhere or hide evidence?
  5. Are there any other potential killers and if so, why would Alice cover for them?

Here are the relevant text excerpts from which we have reconstructed the murder and trial.

[Plymouth Court Records, vol. 2, p 132 for 1 August 1648 (some adjustments to language by Erin Taylor into contemporary English)]

These show, that on July the 22nd, 1648, we, whose names are underwritten, were sworn by Mr. Bradford, Governor, to make inquiry of the death of the child of Alice Bishop, the wife of Richard Bishop. 

We declare, that coming into the house of the said Richard Bishop, we saw at the foot of a ladder which lead into an upper chamber, much blood; and going up all of us into the chamber, we found a woman child, of about four years of age, lying in her shift upon her left cheek, with her throat cut with [numerous] gashes cross ways, the wind pipe cut and stuck into the throat downward, and a bloody knife lying by the side of the child, with which knife all of us judged, and the said Allis hath confessed to five of us at one time, that she murdered the child with the said knife.


Rachel, the wife of Joseph Ramsden, aged about 23 years, being examined, said that coming to the house of Richard Bishop upon an errand, the wife of the said Richard Bishop requested her to go fetch her some buttermilk at Goodwife Winslows, and gave her a kettle for that purpose, and she went and did it; and before she went, she saw the child lying abed asleep, to her best discerning, and the woman was as well as she hath known her at any time; but when she came she found her sad and dumpish; she asked her what blood was that she saw at the ladder’s foot; she pointed unto the chamber, and bid her look, but she perceived she had killed her child, and being afraid, she refused, and ran and told her father and mother.

Moreover, she said the reason that moved her to think she had killed her child was that when she saw the blood she looked on the bed, and the child was not there.

Taken upon oath by me, WILLIAM BRADFORD, the day and year above written.

At a Court of Assistant held at New Plymouth, the first of August, 1648, before Mr. Bradford, Governor, Mr. Coliar, Captain Miles Standish, and Mr. William Thomas, gentlemen, Assistants, the said Alice, being examined, confessed she did commit the aforesaid murder, and is sorry for it.

[Plymouth Court Records, vol 2, p 134 for 4 October 1648]: The General Court convened where Alice “was indicted for felonious murder by her committed upon Martha Clark, her own child, the fruit of her own body.” Governor Bradford and his General Assistants were present and her jurors were Josias Winslow, Sr., Thomas Shillingsworth. Anthony Snowe, Richard Sparrow, Gabriell Fallowell, Joshua Prat, Gyells Rickard, John Shaw, Sr., Steven Wood, William Mericke, William Brete, and John Willis.

These found the said Alice Bishop guilty of the said felonious murdering of Martha Clarke aforesaid; and so she had the sentence of death pronounced against her [and therefore] to be taken from the place where she was to the place from whence she came, and thence to the place of execution, and there to be hanged by the neck until her body is dead which accordingly was executed.

8 thoughts on “Martha’s Murder: 22 July 1648

  1. Hi, Erin,

    I was curious to see if you were posting comments that you receive, so came back to your site and found you had put up some new things. So, a couple of comments on “Martha’s Murder.”

    First, in the “reconstruction of the day’s events,” some of the text is out of order. You’ll probably want to fix that.

    Second, you hypothesize Rachel seeing into the upstairs chamber, where Martha was found dead. I think that the bed Rachel was seeing was in the downstairs area: “before she went, she saw the child lying abed asleep, …Moreover, she said the reason that moved her to think she had killed her child was that when she saw the blood she looked on the bed, and the child was not there.” So apparently, the bed is easily visible, and isn’t the one where Martha was found dead. This would suggest the downstairs bed.

    In “Granddaughters,” you mention “numerous sources that discussed the AMB case….” Would it be possible for you to post a bibliography of these? When I Google AMB, I find many, many web pages from genealogists who quote the written result of he inquiry and the trial, but not much else. I, too, am caught up in the hopeless task of trying to understand what happened, so would like to see what else has been written.

    I can think of two things….In letters to advice columns, we often hear of a family where one child, for whatever reason, is the scapegoat for everything, while the other children are treated well. Or, there are often newspaper articles about parents/guardians/babysitters who have injured or killed a child, most often because they couldn’t make it stop crying.

    On the other hand, in the wild, a male (lion, or whatever) will often kill a female’s cub(s) by another father so that he can take over. Maybe Richard Bishop, perhaps in a fit of rage as suggested above, decided to kill off the (remaining?–Abigail seems to be absent from the story) offspring of his predecessor.

    Some of the genealogy papers have attributed a fourth child to AMB, James Bishop. Have you found any verification for this? I suspect you haven’t, since you haven’t mentioned him.



  2. Lots of good comments Christine of which I’ll try to address most here. Please keep in mind we’re two moms with full time jobs and seven kids between us (6 at home — ack!) soooo…we’re working in between paying the bills and feeding the kiddos. 🙂

    I’m unclear on how you see the reconstruction of the day’s event as out of order. What I did was deconstruct the two PCR documents and then rebuild them sequentially. That’s one reason we put the full text from the PCR at the bottom — so readers can see exactly what we did.

    I’m going to share with Kristin your thoughts that Martha had been moved. I’m not convinced as the coroners state they went up into the chamber and observed the child there.

    Regarding sources, you should look at our page Works Cited. All of the sources I used for the 2011 version of this blog are there. By fall, we should have up our updated list. Kristin and I still have a lot of research to “fold in!”

    Kristin and I have discussed at length a possible other killer and Richard tops that list. We will discuss that in the future but, again, we’re just getting things reloaded. The question remains however, why did Alice so readily admit? My best friend is a former ADA who specialized in crimes against children and she has horror stories of kids being beaten to death because they wet the bed, had colic, etc. So that is a possibility with the AMB case. We’re almost through with a lengthy piece that discusses motive.

    Finally, I have also seen unsourced material about a 4th child, James. All too often the Bishops of Salem are confused with “our” Bishops. If I could ever get sound genealogical proof that AMB had a son, he will certainly be added in.

  3. Hi, Erin,

    When I printed this out, some of the sentences were out of order, but they seem to be okay on the screen.

    I was discussing this case with a friend who also has a child murderer in her history–can’t remember if it was an ancestor or collateral–who slit the throat of her son, who had been seriously injured in a fall from a horse. We decided that we should reopen AMB’s case and get a medium to help us contact Alice and ask her to explain what–and why–happened that day. Perhaps we could find someone in Salem….

    I apologize if I made you feel pressured. It’s just that this ancestor is new to me, and I want to find out as much as possible–which, unfortunately, doesn’t seem to be much. Thanks for all your work on this.



    • We are building an interactive map of Damaris Bishop descendants and ask if you’d be willing to share the town in which you live as well as your first and last name — completely up to you! Thanks, Erin

    • If you want to contact by a medium, by all means go ahead! We don’t have those sort of financial resources but I imagine and readings/interpretations would be interesting. We, too, are frustrated with the lack of records for AMB.

  4. I just recently discovered that I am a descendent of Damaris Bishop. While I am fascinated with the story of AMB, I’ve recently started wondering about the life Damaris would have had. I read on your site that her father was charged with stealing a spade. The wealth seems to have been on the Clarke side, not the Bishop. I haven’t had time yet to peruse your whole site but if you can point me to any specific blogs about this I’d appreciate it.

    Also, you ask where I live. I currently live in Temecula, CA. However, I’m a recent plant here. I’m originally from Pittsburgh, PA and the family branch that descends from Damaris is from Taylorsville, PA.

    • We believe that “our” Damaris Bishop married William Sutton and relocated to NJ where Richard Bishop followed her. She died in Piscataway, NJ about 1682. That is the extent we know about her life except that the Sutton family were affiliated with Anne Hutchinson. Welcome and we hope you’ll have the time to keep reading!

  5. I’m very grateful for this blog…I’m researching several of my other female ancestors, wanting to expand upon their lives and stories, and your sharing of the process through examining Alice’s story is helpful, for sure. Most of what I write will likely be “historical fiction”, rather than academic in its inclination, which will be clearly stated. Nevertheless, I do want to acquire as many facts as possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *