Erin Taylor & Kristin Luce, November 2015
Both England and the colonies followed the rule that no one should be punished for something beyond his comprehension and control. Without moral culpability, there could be no criminal liability. (McManus 105)
It’s easy to make Alice Martin Bishop (AMB) mentally ill. To insist she had postpartum depression, to assume she had to be psychotic. To make her a seventeenth-century Andrea Yates. Because the alternative is to imagine she is a cold-hearted, murdering mother. And for those of us who claim AMB in our family tree, that’s a real downer.
Records of mental illness among seventeenth-century colonists were not kept, but references to people who were perceived as mentally or emotionally unbalanced appear occasionally in colonial records and other contemporary papers. Terms such as “mad,” “idiot,” “deluded,” and “distracted” were used to describe people whom we would probably consider as having attributes of a mental illness or intellectual disability (Eldridge, 362).
In her book, A Disability History of the United States, Kim Nielsen suggests that, in colonial America, few adults would have been labeled with a disability or mentally ill as long as they could do the work they were tasked to do — cutting wood, churning butter, delivering sermons, and so on. So, when we’re looking for evidence that AMB may have been mentally ill, we’re not likely to find it because she still maintained her wifely and maternal roles. The trial records make no mention of her emotional or mental state (save the “sad and dumpish” comment by Rachel Ramsden), but why would they? The jurors believed Alice had knowingly, with intent, murdered Martha — and, indeed, she admitted to doing so.
Alice’s confession contains no reference to voices in her head, or that she believed Martha would be better off dead, or the conviction that either was under demonic possession. AMB merely admitted to the murder and gave no reasons as to why. To us, this connotes either an inability to recognize and deconstruct one’s own thought processes or a sociopathic lack of concern and empathy (this expert behavioral analysis built upon years of watching Law & Order: SVU). And although she did apologize afterward, we can’t know if she did so out of genuine remorse or because she feared her punishment.
While we have no evidence that AMB was perceived as mentally or emotionally unbalanced, dozens of AMB descendants have suggested such. That being said, we wish some researchers and armchair genealogists would stop making presumptions about Alice’s mental health and her motives without backing those up with sourced evidence. Respected homicide historian Randolph Roth, as an example, makes claims that include Alice, despite a lack of documentation: “Every child…murdered by a relative in the frontier period from the 1630s through the 1650s was killed by a deranged or depressed parent” (“Child Murder in America,” 114). Does Alice seem deranged because she nearly decapitated her child? Of course. Would she meet today’s clinical standard for any form of mental illness? We are in no position to answer that. Would she meet a legal standard of insanity? Who knows? We can imagine what happened and why; we can point to patterns and possible causations — but that’s the extent of it. Alice, Martha, and the rest of the Martin-Clarke-Bishop clan deserve the best of our research efforts.
In England, prior to the eighteenth century, mothers were pardoned in court if they were known to be insane or having an intellectual disability. “Madness, not a medical term but a legal one, did not ‘excuse’ a homicide, but averted the death penalty” (Hoffer, 146). Therefore, insanity was not so much a successful defense strategy as it was a way to save a mother from execution during sentencing. Eldridge contends that early colonial law, following English common law, protected persons with mental illness from being convicted of crimes that they could not reasonably be expected to understand they were committing (379).
This does not seem to be true in the American colonies for all cases. In 1690, Mercy Brown murdered her son with an axe in Connecticut. While the court noted Brown was in a “distracted state,” she was, nonetheless, hanged (Eldridge p. 380). In 1639, Dorothy Talbye was hanged in Boston for the murder of her three-year-old child. Talbye’s crime sounds remarkably similar to AMB’s, except that Talbye had previously attempted to kill her children as well as her husband. Talbye had been exiled from the church and publicly whipped – each to no avail. As Governor John Winthrop of Massachussetts Bay Colony recalled her, “She was so possessed with Satan that he persuaded her by his delusions, which she listened to as revelations from God.” Note how the existence of a mental illness is not addressed. In the end, Talbye’s Satan defense could not justify her actions. Furthermore, even if the jurors believed Talbye was in the grips of Satan, there was no saving her – only saving the community’s exposure to one snatched by the Devil (Hoffer, 41).
If anyone noticed Alice being mentally unstable, it would not have helped her much either, because all of this, legally, is a moot point. Judges found all forms of filicide “threats to the entire community” (Hoffer, 40) and punished it severely. The M’Naghten rule, which would be the foundation piece of our modern insanity defense, was centuries away from American courtroom practice.
We can only remain aware of the context that shaped Alice’s beliefs and experiences. It is always unimaginable when a woman murders those to whom she gave birth. We presume every child is cherished and that every woman is hardwired to love childrearing above all other acts. Neither one is true. Filicide severs these quaint notions from us.
I am a direct descendant of Alice Martin and Richard Bishop, her second husband. The couple had a child. A daughter Demarius Bishop who married William Tilden Sutton. He is my 9th great grandfather on my paternal line. William’s father was George Sutton who came over on a ship called the Hercules in 1634. To my utter surprise, Alice was my great grandmother x’s 10. From what I have read, her parents died en route on the Mayflower. Following their death, and landing in Plymouth, she married William Clarke. After his unfortunate death, she was alone with children in a new country with no parents, no husband, and two children to raise alone. That alone is tragic enough. Then to think that she found Richard Bishop as a quick fix husband for fear of being a lone parent and widow, not knowing I’m sure that Richard was virtually a bad egg in a new world, it’s heartbreaking. From what I read on Ancestry documents, Richard was abusive, drunk, a thief, and very eager to get rid of his children to help pay off a debt he owed. From my understanding, that was the likely cause of her actions. Certainly I dont think that is an ‘excuse’ for her act of murder, but as a mother with a moderate imagination, I feel like I understand her now. And him. I truly believe this act was out of desperation, heartache, fear, stress, grief, and sheer panic at the thought of her children being used as leverage and currency. And Richard, being who he is on paper (a thug), wanting to get rid of his step daughter Martha Clarke (age 4) would be the perfect candidate to sell off because it was not his blood. She wasn’t his child. She was William’s daughter. Easier to discard. My guess is that Alice just couldn’t live with this life anymore. After everything she has endured to this point, this is the straw that broke the camels back. She took Martha’s life, perhaps in an effort to save her the pain of living. Maybe I am completely wrong. Maybe I do want to find a reasonable explanation, but this story bears a striking resemblance to Margaret Garner’s story. Margaret was a runaway black slave who had been free with her children for only two hours before she was tracked down by authorities and her master. When Margaret realized that her children were going back into slavery, she decided in that swift moment before recapture, that her children’s life were better brought to an end than having to endure more suffering as nothing more than property or livestock to her owner. She wanted to set them free. So she killed them. In her mind, she truly saved them from a life of bondage. I imagine that with every tragic end that met Alice Martin during her life, she got to a point where there was only one solution left. And so it goes…
Hi Rebekah- I realize you wrote this comment about 9 months ago, but I’ll address some of your points in case you’re still thinking about them. If you take a look at one of our earliest posts, Alice’s Arrival, you’ll see that we no longer think it likely that Alice came over on the Mayflower. Also, her first husband was George Clark, not William. I haven’t read the accounts of Richard that you mention above, but the only behavior we’ve found in the historical documents are a couple of thefts. I’m going to take a closer look soon and see what else I can find out about him, but sometimes we have to accept that the answers we’re looking for simply aren’t out there. Please share any relevant sources or links you think might be helpful. Thanks, Kristin
I’m a descendant and a mother, and grandmother. I have struggled with some sort of explanation for this horrific event. I’ve tried to put myself in her place. What could possibly make me do that? Psychosis is definately a factor. And maybe little Martha was a Holy terror. Maybe Martha tried to harm her infant half sister or worse. I can’t imagine hating my own child that much, or fearing her. But my kids were well behaved and compassionate. What if I had a child with severe behavior problems that just couldn’t be dealt with, disciplined or helped? What if my baby was in danger? Could a four year old push me to the brink of murder? As a descendant, I have to accept and identify with the darker, unstable, behavior disorders and mental illnesses as part of my own, and admit that somehow even I could do such a thing. But why? Maybe Alice and Martha both suffered from the same mental maladies. But in any event, the surviving infant grew up and named her daughter after Alice. There is more to the story. Maybe Alice saved her baby’s life by sacrificing both Martha’s and her own. You just nevet know.
This story is of great interest to me and my family. Our family has a strong tendency towards Bi-polar disorder- many of our relatives have been diagnosed with that and also with Depression. It seems obvious to me that there must be some sort of genetic component. AMB is my 10th great grandmother- our family goes quite far back in New Jersey, especially on my grandfather’s side. His mother was related to Benjamin Rush – there’s a lot of ancestry work that’s been done on his side ( which made things easy for me, when I started). We’re related to AMB through the Sutton side- a Sutton was my 7th great grandfather. I find her story quite compelling. I can imagine that coming to this country must have been traumatic to begin with and then to someone who carries a genetic tendency for depression- truly an horrific experience. I wish we could know more about what happened to her .